Part 7 Delivering the Bad News


Part 7 Delivering the Bad News


Bad news come in different forms. The effect of bad news can be different in different situations. In professional life, sometimes you hold the responsibility of delivering the bad news.  When it comes to delivering the bad news, there are two parties involved – the giver and the receiver.  Understanding the proposition of these two parties and delivering it right is as important as delivering anything else.  That’s the reason I decided to write a chapter on this topic.


92. What is the Proposition?

Sometimes you win and let the other person lose irrespective of how you deliver the bad news.  Your organization is right-sizing and you need to let one of your team members go but your position is secure.  Or one of your product lines is closing and you need to lay off a bunch of engineers. When all this is going on you are getting promoted or you were promoted recently. That is a win-lose.

There can be a situation where you lost one of your team members – that is a big loss for you.  May be your team member joined your competitor or went to pursue new opportunities.  But you have put together all measures to contain the impact.  You are going to tell your customer and assure that your team is going to make it happen.  You are at loss but you are ensuring a win to your customer.  Or you missed your promotion and perhaps increment too this year. You are there to announce a nominal or insignificant increment to your team members. Or out of two high-performers shortlisted for international travel only one has got an approval to travel because of budget cuts.  You are not impacted but your team member whose travel was not approved is going to be upset.

You are working on a high visibility mission-critical project and you come across frequent server crashes. You have no way of controlling the schedule.  It is lose-lose situation for your team and your customer. Or you failed to bag a large deal because of both known and unknown reasons. Your team is stranded because of this failure and looming uncertainty.   Or you come to know that the product to be delivered next week cannot be delivered because of critical defects. Or your organization decided to close your branch office due to a major restructuring and slump in business.

The situations are copious.  When you know the art and science of delivering bad news, situations like this can improve your stickiness with your team and customers.  But never have I come across a situation that can be handled without preparation. Every situation requires thorough understanding and analysis. Else the end result can be disastrous. Needless to say, situations like this will have significant impact on what the ultimate deliverable – a product or a service or something else.

*-*-*-*-*

93. Know Your Customer Expectations

There is no customer in this world who says, ‘Keep the bad news to yourself, try to turnaround and come back to me when nothing works and however late it gets’.  Meanwhile it does it mean that you need to take the bad news to customer before doing your homework.

In 2003, I was fortunate to be part of a growing team.  At that time, I was managing a portfolio of projects for an independent software vendor.  With a team of more than forty engineers, we were interviewing on all days including weekends to fulfill open positions.  Our target was to hire ten more engineers. Hiring was really a taxing affair in our daily schedule.  One of our projects was going off the track – we were delaying task completion daily with an attitude to catchup at a later stage.  We were three months into that project.

In one of our project status call in July our customer asked my project lead, ‘Do you think we can deliver this product by the end of September?’

‘Let me revisit our plan and come back to you with a firm answer next week’. That was my lead, Vijay.

Vijay had admitted to me earlier that he expected a delay. He couldn’t articulate more. I was busy on multiple projects and ramping up our team.  Vijay and I met to go over the project plan and the status of various tasks.  There was a definite delay of four weeks. The task of delivering this bad news was imminent and daunting in front of us.

It was a bad news because we had no way of turning that situation around. The situation was out of control.  In fact, a month ago, this story was no different.  We did not perceive that situation right. That was our mistake.

What a learning experience! No doubt, we missed an opportunity of involving our customer in a timely manner to find options. In reality, a bad news is a bad news. The longer you keep the worse it gets.

The next week, Vijay and I delivered the bad news to our customer. Our customer was furious. Furious because we delayed the bad news by a month.  Until a week before, we had conducted the show with a false hope that the situation would improve somehow. And it didn’t.

Hiding bad news does not help unless you are confident of turning around the situation with no impact on your stakeholders. When you have that confidence, it is not a bad news. It is an issue or a tough situation. A situation that you are fully aware and confident of turning around.   With thorough analysis when you determine that you don’t have that confidence, it is bad news and nothing else. The immediate next step is to deliver it to your stakeholders.  You can’t afford to delay. And you must deliver it right.

When you are working towards delivering something, you exceed estimates. That will result in schedule overrun.  There are ways to bring your project back on track. But after doing all your homework if you come to know that schedule slippage is inevitable, you must accept that bad news.  You can’t delay the process of delivering that bad news to your stakeholders.

All customers want the bad news delivered on time!   And they want you to be their advisor too. Go with your suggestions and possible choices to make things happen.

When we met our customer to deliver the bad news, Vijay started the conversation by putting things in perspective. Also, he put across his ideas on how our team can deliver the end product in two phases to minimize the impact of this delay. Our customer liked that idea and set the expectation again.  The expectation was to deliver the bad news with no delay.

*-*-*-*-*

94. Involve Internal Stakeholders

When you communicate bad news to your customer or an external stakeholder it is highly likely that they are going to call an internal stakeholder – probably someone up in the hierarchy.  When that happens, unless your internal stakeholders are aware of the situations, they will be caught off-guard.  That will punch a hole in your work relationship and the trust factor between you and your internal stakeholders. Involve your internal stakeholders first. Your boss needs to know the situation. Present your options and listen. Involve your boss so that she is not caught off-guard.

Don’t slip things under the carpet! Once a team member of mine wrote an email to our customer and informed that the software build did not work due to some reason because of build errors.  He did not tell either me – his boss, or my boss.  He sent that email right at the end of the day and went home. Within thirty minutes my phone was ringing. That was a call from my customer. She wanted me to conference with my boss to discuss the situation.  Both my boss and I were unaware of the bad news. 
An embarrassing situation!

When it comes to customer expectation management and delivering bad news, define a process and create a checklist so that you don’t fail twice.

*-*-*-*-*

95. The Server Crashed

Once I was working with a performance testing team. That was a small team of five bright engineers. In performance testing projects both the product and platform are critical.  By platform, I mean the servers on which we run the tests. Each test used to consume twenty-four to thirty hours.  If there is a server crash when the tests are running, we must restart the tests. Or find work around if feasible.  Workarounds are not guaranteed for all tests. 

In our project, one of the servers crashed. That was the first time. We rerun the tests.  We could manage that delay by putting some internal measures in place.  It happened twice. And thrice.  That was a big problem as each server crash was challenging our schedule. A bad news.  A news which is not as simple as saying, ‘Servers are crashing. We want to the IT department to fix this issue as early as possible.’ We had to think further and probe if there is another server available for our project. We need to think further to see if we can shorten the run time of our tests. We did all that before presenting our case to our stakeholders.  Our approach made everyone empathize with the situation.  

We got help from all ends to make things right. And our project continued.

Do enough ‘what-if’ analysis.  Identify alternate options.  Sometimes, it may take a while to solve the core issue. However, with lateral thinking and pooling in ideas you will find a way to make progress.
When you deliver a plain bad news, the next question is obvious. In this example, it is, ‘Yes, It is unfortunate that the server crashed thrice. If this problem persists, what options do we have? What do you suggest? Do we have to wait? Or do we have other ideas to continue our work?’  When you go with the bad news, be prepared to answer such follow-up questions.

*-*-*-*-*

96. From Peaks to Troughs

Couple of weeks before Thanksgiving, Tim called Andy for a quick meeting.  ‘Andy, can I talk to you for a minute?’  That is how it started.  Andy went into Tim’s office. Tim was there to break the news.  Their top management had decided to right-size.  That meant a 20% staff reduction in Andy’s team.  Tim wanted Andy to stack rank his team members and identify the bottom 20% and then do a team meeting to set the context among all team members.  Andy was worried, as he had handled a similar situation before. 

‘Tim, what if some of the top performers leave?  How can we deliver our next release which is due in February?’

Tim answered but it was not convincing. He said, ‘We must tell everyone. And we must retain all our top performers. We can’t afford to lose them. I am with you.’  Andy nodded with a poker face.
Budget cuts happen every year. That means bad news. Bad news to team members. When we don’t turn it around, it may turn out to be a negative impact on customer satisfaction. A vicious cycle. The mandate from senior management is to let go the shortlisted and retain everyone else. Does it happen on the ground?

Andy was not convinced. To him it was not about budget cuts and layoffs. It meant more.

‘All our team members are great performers. We are doing this because of budget cuts. How about helping them find jobs and extending their notice period? That will at least encourage our team in regaining momentum after this episode. I am sure February release is very important to us and we must look beyond that.’

Every bad news has the potential to carry long-term consequences.  Sure, this situation had significant impact on the impending product releases. 

Tim agreed to deal with the situation in a comprehensive manner and assure enough assistance to the team members.  Tim and Andy worked with their HR department and identified some of the top recruiters who can help the shortlisted team members find a job. This was a crucial part of their homework before delivering the bad news to their team members.

Every team and every project goes through its peaks and troughs.  Troughs mean bad news the consequence of which can vary depending on the situation. However, delivering the bad news right is critical.

*-*-*-*-*

97. SPIKES and BREAKS

SPIKES is a six-step protocol for delivering bad news and it is used in healthcare industry for disclosing unfavorable information to cancer patients.  Breaking bad news is a complex task.  According to a survey, ninety-nine percent of the respondents reported that SPIKES was practical and easy to understand.  Breaking bad news is learned by observing experienced professionals.  Colleges or Universities do not provide any training in this subject area.  SPIKES defines a protocol on how to deliver bad news. The six steps of SPIKES focus on preparation, understanding the context and perception of the patient, knowing the history of the patient, getting to know how must to reveal, identifying when to reveal the rest and with whom, giving the knowledge and information to the patient, addressing the patient’s questions and emotions, planning the next steps and follow through.
 
The professional who delivers bad news is a subject matter expert. SPIKES provides the protocol. And the delivery has to be flawless and legitimate.  Nothing can go wrong.  One cannot afford to design the script when the process of communicating bad news is in progress.  It has to be planned in advance.

BREAKS is another protocol that provides a systematic and easy communication strategy for breaking bad news.  It has six steps – Background, Rapport, Exploring, Announce, Kindling and Summarize.  A physician who use BREAKS goes through these steps one by one.  She starts with understanding the background of the patient and the problem or illness and does all the homework. The next step is to build rapport and enough comfort to initiate the discussion. The third step is to understand or explore what the patient knows about what has happened so far and acknowledge and align the patient. The fourth step is to announce the current situation – the bad news – in a straightforward manner with empathy without using any jargons. The fifth step, ‘Kindling’ as it called, is about ascertaining by asking simple questions to ensure that the patient’s understanding of the situation it correct. The final step is to summarize the action plan and assure that the physician is there to support in all ongoing actions.

There are definitive takeaways for us from SPIKES and BREAKS even though not all situations that involve bad news in IT industry are life threatening.  A bad news in IT industry can have serious consequences such as loss of money, loss of trust, brand erosion, loss of market share, loss of jobs and so on.  And it travels fast. Hence, one who is responsible to communicate or deliver bad news must act fast in a systematic manner before the news spreads and boomerangs.  To do this we need a step-by-step approach.  Here are the critical steps I have followed and wanted to share with the readers.
  1. Understand the situation well. Have one or two experts with you depending on the situation. Arrive at action plans – possibly two or three options to take things forward.
  2. Understand the history of the recipient and track record of the relationship.  Check if this bad news is because of a recurring issue or risk.
  3. Understand the power, influence and standpoint of the recipient. Decide if you need to invite additional recipients.
  4. Schedule a meeting.  Set the context. Communicate. Present action plans. Listen. Address concerns. Decide on the next steps.
  5. Acknowledge and thank everyone who participated.
  6. Act on the action plan and make it happen.

What is the equivalent of SPIKES or BREAKS in your organization?

*-*-*-*-*

98. Don’t Assume

Don’t assume that the software you are going to deliver will fare well in production and support millions of users. Make sure that your system architecture and production infrastructure is adequate to support millions of users. If any of your team members alert you about such risk, stop and listen to them. Ask probing questions.  It may be a signal of an upcoming bad news.

Obama care website was released to users on 1st October 2013 and it turned out to be yet another delivery disaster in the world of IT.  Michael Scherer, Washington Bureau Chief for TIME wrote an article ‘Traffic Didn’t Crash the Obamacare Site Alone. Bad Coding Did Too’ in which he wrote,
‘After three weeks of breakdowns, Obama decided that he could no longer stand by his own spin. “Nobody is madder than me about the fact that the website isn’t working,” he said Oct. 21 in a Rose Garden speech that instructed others to stop “sugarcoating” the problems. In fact, the warning signs have been clear for months inside government, even if the White House failed to sniff them out. Federal auditors raised alarms in June, warning of missed deadlines and unfinished work. Administration officials have since put out the call for new contractors, and Silicon Valley talent, to fix the work.’

On 27th October the website crashed and it crashed again on Oct 31st.  This bad news spread like a virus on both print and electronic media.

In his news article of Dec 2013 titled ‘White House Declares Obama Care Website Fixed, But Problems Persists’, Devin Dwyer of ABC News wrote,
Insurers continue to complain about unreliable data on applicants which they receive from the site. And the administration has not yet completed building the electronic payment system that will transfer government subsidies to insurance companies to help cover the cost of plans.’

What lessons do such events offer you? There are many lessons. I would emphasize on a simple one. It is about enhancing your anticipatory skills.  Without this you cannot predict what is in store for what you are going to deliver.

If you don’t identify and deliver bad news, it becomes a bad news and gets delivered to you. You are answerable!

*-*-*-*-*

99. The Inevitable

It happened sometime in 2002.  One of my friends who used to work for a start-up company.  He was in a senior position.  A year ago, he had redefined the technology road-map and business plan of the company which was in deep financial trouble.  He had interviewed and hired more than fifty percent of the team members. And he wanted to see a turnaround but the runway was getting shorter and shorter because of lack of additional funds.  In spite of this, all employees were confident and wanted to launch their three core products.  Some of them accepted pay cuts.  Some others put extra efforts.  All of them did these together to save the company. It did not happen and they had to face the reality.
During those days, this was the story in many other startups as well.

A situation that brings everything to a full stop. A tough situation. Product lines are closed as the entire business plan nosedived. You are part of the senior management. You have something to deliver. You have to deliver the news to your employees, investors and partners. You must do it before the news appears in a website or a newspaper.

My friend and his senior management team decided to follow a layered approach. They took all their next level of direct reports into confidence and explained them the situation.  They listened to their suggestions and ideas. Most of them were against the idea of closing the business. They wanted the brand to live longer.  They ascertained that that would be the voice of all employees as well.  When the CEO and his team facilitated an all-hands meeting, they started by setting the context and assuring the welfare of employees.  The CEO doubled the notice period of all employees and assured placement assistance.  The HR team worked almost round the clock to make this happen.   A small team of senior management stayed together and revived the business after a year.  No doubt, many employees who had left earlier came back and joined the team.

Those who work with conviction and look beyond the setbacks have the capability to sail through tough times and revive.  When we come across a bad news and when it becomes inevitable, we must remember that there is going to be something better beyond the inevitable if we have the power to visualize.

*-*-*-*-*

6 Workplace Challenges                                Table of Contents                                    The Runway    


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Deliverable

Part 6 Workplace Challenges

Prologue